|
Everything here is E-mail, unmodified and interesting. If you've ever been curious as to the kinds of things I get in my mailbox, and the responses I've given, you'll probably like reading this page! E-mail addresses are not presented to respect the privacy of the original author (names, however, aren't my problem).
Jody Hagar wrote:
Are you kidding me???????????
Nope.
Most if not all crimes are a matter of public record so why shouldn't the same be for these sick people.
Crime is a matter of public record, but current address and other personal information is NOT a matter of public record. Also, not everyone on a Registry is a "sick person." Google "Genarlow Wilson" for more info.
If making their information public prevents one child from being molested, raped, killed, etc, IT'S WORTH IT!
Then let's disseminate the same information about you, along with the results of a state-mandated sexual arousal test that examines your level of arousal when exposed to different and varied forms of sexually suggestive material. After all, if violating the privacy and Constitutionally guaranteed freedoms and inalienable human rights of hundreds of thousands of people will save just one child's life, then it's worth it, right?
Instead of spewing all this venom why not come up with valid solutions to what you deem as a problem, instead of wasting time.
I have. You didn't read my site very well. You seem to have responded from reading very little of my site and auto-tagging me as a defender of child molesters. On that you are dead wrong, and if you want solutions, read more before writing this kind of hateful message to me on a knee-jerk assumption. Remember, "assuming makes an ASS out of U and ME."
No matter what we as a community do, there will always be someone who is unhappy.
True, you can't satisfy everyone, and why should you? However, compromising fundamental rights and beliefs on which this nation was founded solely for the purpose of boosting *perceived* security, as well as passing laws that run counter to the findings in numerous studies performed by highly authoritative sources in criminal corrections which actually DECREASE REAL SECURITY is unacceptable, regardless of the circumstances. There's a reason that sex offender laws are often referred to as "feel-good legislation."
Sadly, the decline of human morality will only lead to more of these crimes along with the increase in homicides, fraud, property crimes, violent domestics (which I don't see you complaining about any of those). So, I can only assume you are one of these sick people.
Morality is in the eye of the beholder, but I won't open that can of worms with you because you're clearly upset enough without breaking out a full-blown discussion on libertarian philosophy. The truth, my friend, is that the number of new sexual offenses per 100,000 (or whatever other unit you choose) have been on the decline since well before the first sex offender registration law was passed, and have continued to do so. Registration has not increased that decline with enough significance to measure; its success rides on the coattails of a trend that has been going on since I was a youth. The only reason that you are perceiving more crime now than ever is due to the Internet's connecting together of people, bringing every single homicide, rape, or domestic abuse case in the world straight to the fingertips of both you and the media. Also, it's good for ratings and it's a definite plus to any politician that exploits your fears caused by the perception changes to gain your vote.
I don't comment on homicide, fraud, property crimes, etc. because that's not the cause I've taken up. I can't discuss one thing and discuss it well if I am trying to hit on every other criminal subject to keep people like you from being able to sneer at me over my choice of discussion topics. Your statement is irrelevant.
As for assuming that I am a member of some group of "sick people," we've covered the assumption aspect already, and you can think what you want to think, but the harsh reality is that who I am doesn't change how true or false my words are. This is a typical reaction, and I get it all the time. Attack the person speaking rather than his talking points to win the argument. It's called a "straw man fallacy" and it won't work.
If you choose to write me back, at least read my ENTIRE SITE before you do so. You must understand all that I have written before you can hope to argue against it, and if you have valid arguments against anything I say, I'll gladly examine them and change my position accordingly.
Best wishes,
TAO
Questions? Comments? E-mail the Offender and let him know what you think!
[ Main Page ]
|
